Karmatā and Karma Yoga Buddhi - Metaphor of an episode from Adi Parva
In our satsangha, we have often used Yudhiṣṭhira and Arjuna
to understand the difference between karmatā and karma yogi. Both are dhārmika.
Both are noble. Both have deep reverence for elders, teachers and śāstra. Their
inner posture differs.
DISCLAIMER: Yudhiṣṭhira is a far nobler and
highly qualified aspirant than this essay may appear to give him credit for. I
am undertaking this exercise only to help us recognize certain mental
proclivities within ourselves, one way or the other.
This essay is not an indictment
of Yudhiṣṭhira,
the great mahātmā who gave us the Yakṣa-praśna and the Nahuṣa-praśna, and whose
questions to Bhīṣmācārya gave us the great Śānti-parva and Anuśāsana-parva,
containing more than 20,000 ślokas of teaching.
The purpose here is limited: to
showcase the subtle difference between Yudhiṣṭhira and Arjuna, so that we may be inspired by
the noble qualities that both embodied, while also recognizing the lakṣya-śuddhi
needed for karma-yoga-buddhi.
Karmatā is a person whose life is sincerely centered on vaidika karma, kartavya, puṇya, family, security, artha, kāma, and loka, all regulated by dharma. Such a person is noble, disciplined, and devout, but has not yet made mokṣa the governing goal of life.
Karmatā can be sincere, disciplined and admirable. Karmatā still
moves within the field of kartavya, puṇya, family, security, loka, sukha, artha
and kāma. Karma yogi begins when action is gathered around one governing
clarity: Bhagavān, Dharma and finally mokṣa as parama puruṣārtha. The goal of
life, is well established in the mind of the Karma Yogi.
[In other words, a karma yogi is one whose actions are gathered around a single governing clarity: Bhagavān is the refuge, Dharma is the means, and mokṣa is the goal. Every action becomes an offering to Īśvara and a means for inner purification, rather than merely a means for worldly or heavenly attainment.]
Last week, in our Gītā-manana satsangha, one satsangha
bandhu brought up the occasion to discuss Yudhiṣṭhira and Arjuna again. We
looked at the episode in the Ādi-parva where Śrī Droṇa tests the Kuru princes
by asking them to shoot a wooden bird placed on a distant tree.
Śrī Bhagavān Vyāsa presents Yudhiṣṭhira and Arjuna in a very
precise contrast. The story is simple. The teaching inside the story is subtle.
1. Ācārya Droṇa sets up the target
One day Ācārya Droṇa wanted to test the princes, especially
the gathered condition of the mind beyond technical skill. A wooden bird was
placed on the top of a tree at some distance. Each student was asked to take
aim. Droṇa then questioned each one. The answer revealed the mind.
1.142.78
kṛtrimaṃ bhāsam āropya vṛkṣāgre śilpibhiḥ kṛtam
avijñātaṃ kumārāṇāṃ lakṣya-bhūtam upādiśat
Having a crafted bird, made by artisans, placed on the top
of a tree, Droṇa designated it as the target. The princes did not know
beforehand what the target was.
1.142.79-80
droṇa uvāca
śīghraṃ bhantaḥ sarve ’pi dhanūṃṣy ādāya sarvaśaḥ
bhāsam etaṃ samuddiśya tiṣṭhadhvaṃ saṃdhiteṣv ataḥ
madvākya-samakālaṃ tu śiro ’sya vinipātyatām
ekaikaśo niyokṣyāmi tathā kuruta putrakāḥ
Droṇa said: Quickly, all of you take up your bows. Stand
here in readiness, aiming at this bird.
At the exact moment of my word, its head must be struck
down. I will command you one by one. Do accordingly, my sons.
2. Yudhiṣṭhira’s turn
1.142.81-82
tato yudhiṣṭhiraṃ pūrvam uvācāṅgirasāṃ varaḥ
saṃdhatsva bāṇaṃ durdharṣa mad-vākyānte vimokṣyatām
tato yudhiṣṭhiraḥ pūrvaṃ dhanur gṛhya parantapaḥ
tasthau bhāsaṃ samuddiśya guru-vākya-pracoditaḥ
Then the foremost among the Aṅgirases, Droṇa, first
addressed Yudhiṣṭhira: Fix the arrow, O difficult-to-overcome one. At the end
of my word, let it be released.
Then Yudhiṣṭhira, scorcher of foes, took up the bow and
stood aiming at the bird, moved by the command of the Guru.
1.142.83-84
tato
vitata-dhanvānaṃ droṇas taṃ kuru-nandanam
sa muhūrtād
uvācedaṃ vacanaṃ bharatarṣabha
paśyasi tvaṃ
drumāgrasthaṃ bhāsaṃ nara-varātmaja
paśyāmīty evam
ācāryaṃ pratyuvāca yudhiṣṭhiraḥ
Then Droṇa
saw that Kuru-nandana had drawn his bow. After a moment, he spoke these
words: O best among men, do you see the bird standing on the top of the tree?
Yudhiṣṭhira replied to the Ācārya: I see it.
Reflection: Let us imagine the scene carefully. Yudhiṣṭhira
answers the question. Perhaps he turns toward the Ācārya while answering. Droṇa,
seeing the condition of the mind (by reading his face) asks the next question.
1.142.85-87
sa muhūrtād iva punar droṇas taṃ pratyabhāṣata
atha vṛkṣam imaṃ māṃ vā bhrātṝn vā ’pi prapaśyasi
tam uvāca sa kaunteyaḥ paśyāmy enaṃ vanaspatim
bhavantaṃ ca tathā bhrātṝn bhāsaṃ ceti punaḥ punaḥ
tam uvācāpasarpeti droṇo ’prīta-manā iva
naitac chakyaṃ tvayā veddhuṃ lakṣyam ity eva kutsayan
After a moment, Droṇa again asked him: Do you see this
tree, or me, or your brothers?
That son of Kuntī replied: I see this.
I see you also, and my brothers, and the bird, again and again.
Droṇa, as though displeased, said to him: "Step aside. This target cannot be struck by you".
Reflection: Here we see Yudhiṣṭhira’s mind taking in
the whole field. It is a kind and noble mind. It is a dhārmika mind, though devoid of the sharp focus that Sri Droṇa was looking for.
This is where Yudhiṣṭhira helps us understand a karmatā.
We want balance in life. We want bhoga and yoga, while avoiding roga. We want comfort, but within sanction of dharma. We value religion and spirituality as important parts of life, while still keeping artha and kāma active. We know mokṣa is there, but it is deferred (for later). Dharma becomes the regulating principle that keeps artha and kāma from running wild. Īśvara-bhakti, though beautiful and pleasing to the karmatā, remains as one more meaningful endeavor in life, among many others.
This is the mindset of svarga-kāmo yajeta. The one who desires svarga performs yajña. Of course there is Svarga, as another lokah, but here we can imagine that Svarga for the purposes of our understanding, as pleasure without liability, luxury without friction. Such people are good children of noble parents and great upbringing. Even today, most parents want such a samatthu kuzhanthai (as they say in Tamizh), a good child, like Yudhiṣṭhira.
Arjuna is admired. But Yudhiṣṭhira feels safer 😊
Now let’s think about Arjuna. He had Yudhiṣṭhira, Bhīṣma and Droṇa as role models. Bhīṣma was
his pitāmaha, a beloved elder and great hero. Droṇa
was his beloved Ācārya and a father figure. Yudhiṣṭhira was dharma-rāja in the family. But whenever
he or his family faced the most testing conditions in life, the light of clarity
in his life was Īśvara – i.e. Lord Śiva, or Śrī Kṛṣṇa,
his suḥṛt.
When Yudhiṣṭhira faced dharma-saṅkaṭa, he tended to interpret, weigh and negotiate within the framework of dharma. Arjuna, when pushed beyond himself, knew one thing: where there is Kṛṣṇa, there will have been Dharma (yato dharmas tataḥ kr̥ṣṇo yataḥ kr̥ṣṇas tato jayaḥ - 6.41.54 Mbh CE), where there is Kṛṣṇa, there victory is a foregone conclusion!
That is a key difference between a karmatā and a karma yogi. Something we must bear in mind, as we dive deeper into Gita studies and apply it in our own life.
Let us return to the story.
3. Arjuna’s turn: only the bird
1.143.1-3
tato dhanañjayaṃ droṇaḥ smayamāno ’bhyabhāṣata
tvayedānīṃ prahartavyam etad lakṣyaṃ vilokyatām
madvākya-samakālaṃ te moktavyo ’tra bhavet śaraḥ
vitatya kārmukaṃ putra tiṣṭha tāvan muhūrtakam
evam uktaḥ savyasācī maṇḍalī-kṛta-kārmukaḥ
tasthau bhāsaṃ samuddiśya guru-vākya-pracoditaḥ
Then Droṇa, smiling, addressed Dhanañjaya: Now this target
is to be struck by you. Look at it.
At the exact moment of my word, your arrow must be
released here. Draw the bow, my son, and stand thus for a moment.
So addressed, Savyasācin, with his bow bent into a circle,
stood aiming at the bird, moved by the Guru’s command.
1.143.4-5
muhūrtād iva taṃ droṇas tathaiva samabhāṣata
paśyasy enaṃ sthitaṃ bhāsaṃ drumaṃ mām api cārjuna
paśyāmy ekaṃ bhāsam iti droṇaṃ pārtho ’bhyabhāṣata
na tu vṛkṣaṃ bhavantaṃ vā paśyāmīti ca bhārata
After a moment, Droṇa spoke to him in the same way:
Arjuna, do you see this bird standing there, the tree, and me also?
Pārtha replied to Droṇa: I see only the bird. I do not see
the tree or you.
1.143.6-7
tataḥ prīta-manā droṇo muhūrtād iva taṃ punaḥ
pratyabhāṣata durdharṣaḥ pāṇḍavānāṃ mahāratham
bhāsaṃ paśyasi yady enaṃ tathā brūhi punar vacaḥ
śiraḥ paśyāmi bhāsasya na gātram iti so ’bravīt
Then Droṇa, pleased in mind, after a moment again
addressed that formidable mahāratha among the Pāṇḍavas: If you see this bird,
describe it once more.
Arjuna said: I see the head of the bird, not the body.
1.143.8-11
arjunenaivam uktas tu droṇo hṛṣṭa-tanūruhaḥ
muñcasvety abravīt pārthaṃ sa mumocāvicārayan
tatas tasya gatasya kṣureṇa niśitena ca
śira utkṛtya tarasā pātayām āsa pāṇḍavaḥ
tasmin karmaṇi saṃsiddhe paryaṣvajata pāṇḍavam
mene ca drupadaṃ saṅkhye sānubandhaṃ parājitam
kasya cit tv atha kālasya sa-śiṣyo ’ṅgirasāṃ varaḥ
jagāma gaṅgām abhito majjituṃ bharatarṣabha
Thus addressed by Arjuna, Droṇa’s hair stood on end with
joy. He said to Pārtha: Release it. Arjuna released the arrow without
hesitation.
With that sharp, razor-headed arrow, the Pāṇḍava swiftly
cut off the bird’s head and made it fall.
When that act had been completed, Droṇa embraced the Pāṇḍava.
He considered Drupada, together with his followers, as already defeated in
battle.
After some time, that best of the Aṅgirases went toward
the Gaṅgā with his disciples to bathe, O bull among the Bharatas.
4. The Gītā’s teaching: vyavasāyātmikā buddhi
Reflection: This single-mindedness
made Arjuna the foremost archer of that yuga. The Gītā gives a precise
expression for this: vyavasāyātmikā
buddhi, the
buddhi that is gathered, resolved and one-pointed. See verses below :-
Bhagavad Gītā 2.41
vyavasāyātmikā
buddhir
ekeha kuru-nandana
bahu-śākhā hy anantāś ca buddhayo avyavasāyinām
Here, O Kuru-nandana, the understanding marked by firm
determination is one. The understanding of the irresolute is many-branched and
endless.
Bhagavad Gītā 2.44
bhogaiśvarya-prasaktānāṃ tayāpahṛta-cetasām
vyavasāyātmikā
buddhiḥ
samādhau na vidhīyate
For those attached to pleasure and power, whose minds are
carried away by that, the resolute understanding does not arise in samādhi.
Bhagavad Gītā 2.45
traiguṇya-viṣayā vedā nistraiguṇyo bhavārjuna
nirdvandvo nitya-sattva-stho niryoga-kṣema ātmavān
The Vedas deal with the field of the three guṇas. Be free
from the hold of the three guṇas, O Arjuna. Be free from the pairs of
opposites, ever established in sattva, free from anxiety over acquisition and
preservation, and abide in the Self.
These verses are given to Arjuna on the battlefield. They
tell us what is needed for karma-yoga-buddhi. The mind cannot be scattered into
endless branches. It must be trained to gather itself around the highest end. There
ought to be lakshya shuddhi.
The wooden-bird episode is a metaphor that shows that Arjuna
had this disposition even in his early days. When the Ācārya’s word
came, the mind did not spread itself across the tree, the teacher, the brothers
and the general field. The mind stood where it had to stand.
This episode also gives us a useful metaphor for
understanding the difference between karmatā and karma-yoga-buddhi.
Karmatā is commitment to Vedic karma, but largely for the
sake of bhoga, aiśvarya, puṇya,
and orderly prosperity.
Such pursuits may have Vedic sanction, but when the mind
remains attached to them as ends in themselves, the vyavasāyātmikā buddhi
needed for karma-yogitvam does not arise. Take the Gita 2.42, which criticizes those
who quote the Vedas, to profess sanction for the pursuit of bhoga &
aiśvarya.
Bhagavad Gītā 2.42
yām imāṃ puṣpitāṃ
vācaṃ
pravadanty avipaścitaḥ ।
veda-vāda-ratāḥ pārtha nānyad astīti vādinaḥ
॥ 2.42 ॥
O Pārtha, the
undiscerning ones, who are delighted by the ritualistic portions of the Veda
(because they satisfy the needs for bhoga, aiśvarya), and who say that there is
nothing beyond this, speak these flowery words.
To be a karmatā like Yudhiṣṭhira is an admirable starting point. It must mature into karma-yoga-buddhi.
Disclaimer (again): Yudhiṣṭhira is a far nobler and highly qualified aspirant
than this essay may appear to give him credit for. I am undertaking this
exercise only to help us recognize certain mental proclivities within
ourselves, one way or the other.
This essay is not an indictment of
Yudhiṣṭhira, the
great mahātmā who gave us the Yakṣa-praśna and the Nahuṣa-praśna, and whose
questions to Bhīṣmācārya gave us the great Śānti-parva and Anuśāsana-parva,
containing more than 20,000 ślokas of teaching.
The purpose here is limited: to
showcase the subtle difference between Yudhiṣṭhira and Arjuna, so that we may be inspired by the
noble qualities that both embodied, while also recognizing the lakṣya-śuddhi
needed for karma-yoga-buddhi.
Between Yudhiṣṭhira and Arjuna, Arjuna had the adhikāritvam
for Vedānta-śravaṇam in the Gītā context because he had daivī-sampat. Bhagavān
himself says:
Bhagavad Gītā 16.5
daivī sampad vimokṣāya nibandhāyāsurī matā
mā śucaḥ sampadaṃ daivīm abhijāto ’si pāṇḍava
The divine disposition is considered to lead to freedom;
the asuri disposition to bondage. Do not grieve, O Pāṇḍava. You are born to the
divine disposition.
So it is fitting that Bhagavān taught the Gītā to
Arjuna.
5. Learning from Upaniṣad
Reflection: This very idea of steadying the aim and keeping one’s attention fixed upon the lakṣyam becomes an important metaphor when we approach Vedānta. The Upaniṣad directs the mind toward that which is subtler than the subtlest, the innermost Self that cannot be objectified through the senses.
For this, let us turn to the Kaṭhopaniṣad and Bhagavān Bhāṣyakāra’s vachanam.
Kaṭhopaniṣad 1.3.12
eṣa sarveṣu bhūteṣu gūḍho 'tmā na prakāśate ।
dṛśyate tv agryayā buddhyā sūkṣmayā sūkṣmadarśibhiḥ ॥
This Ātmā, hidden in all beings, does not reveal itself. It is recognized by those capable of discerning the subtle, through a refined, subtle and one-pointed buddhi.
Reflection: Here, hidden does not mean spatially concealed, as though Ātmā were an object located somewhere deep within the body. Ātmā is hidden because it is covered by habitual identification with the body, senses, mind and intellect.
Bhagavān Bhāṣyakāra explains: darśana-śravaṇādi-karma-avidyā-māyayā channaḥ
Ātmā is covered by the māyā consisting of avidyā and the activities of seeing, hearing and other sensory functions.
Reflection: The Self is always present as the very consciousness because of which every experience is known. Yet attention is continuously directed toward what is seen, heard, thought, desired, feared, acquired and rejected. The dṛśyam occupies the mind so completely that the draṣṭā, the very basis of every experience, remains unrecognized.
ātmā na prakāśate ātmatvena kasyacit
Ātmā does not become evident to a person as the Self.
Reflection: It is not that Ātmā does not shine. Ātmā is self-revealing consciousness. It is that the person does not recognize that consciousness as "I am".
Now Bhagavān Bhāṣyakāra exclaims in wonder (as it were) -
āho atigambhīrā duravagāhyā vicitrā ca iyam māyā
→ Oh! How profound (atigambhīrā), difficult to comprehend (duravagāhyā), and wondrous (vicitrā) this māyā isyat ayam sarvaḥ jantuḥ paramārthataḥ paramārthasatattvaḥ api
→ that this entire being (sarvaḥ jantuḥ), though truly (paramārthataḥ) of the nature of ultimate reality (paramārthasatattvaḥ api)evaṃ bodhyamānaḥ na gṛhṇāti “aham paramātmā” iti
→ even when taught thus, does not grasp “I am the Supreme Self” (aham paramātmā iti)
anātmānaṃ deha-indriya-ādi-saṅghātam
→ instead, the non-Self (anātmānam), namely the aggregate of body, senses, etc. (deha-indriya-ādi-saṅghātam)ātmano dṛśyamānam api ghaṭa-ādivat
→ though seen as an object (dṛśyamānam api), like a pot (ghaṭa-ādivat)ātmatvena aham amuṣya putraḥ iti gṛhṇāti
→ is taken as the Self (ātmatvena), as in “I am this person’s son” (aham amuṣya putraḥ iti)
nūnaṃ parasya eva māyayā mohya-mānaḥ sarvaḥ lokaḥ bambhramīti
→ surely (nūnam), deluded by the Lord’s māyā (parasya eva māyayā mohya-mānaḥ), the whole world (sarvaḥ lokaḥ) wanders भ्रम (bambhramīti)
tathā ca smaraṇam — "nāhaṃ prakāśaḥ sarvasya yogamāyā-samāvṛtaḥ"
→ Thus also remembered: “I am not manifest to all, being covered by yogamāyā” (nāhaṃ prakāśaḥ sarvasya yogamāyā-samāvṛtaḥ) (Acharya is quoting Bhag.Gita 7.25)
Reflection: Here we see our Ācārya exclaiming in wonder that, even though the truth is directly taught and revealed by the Śruti, we nevertheless continue to hold fast to the untruth that "I am the body," "I am the mind," and so on. He remarks that this indeed is the great māyā of Bhagavān, for which he cites Bhagavad Gītā 7.25 to underscore the point.
Yet, just as the Śruti itself declares, Ācārya assures us that "it is indeed seen" (dṛśyate tu) by a refined (saṃskṛtayā), sharp (agryayā) intellect, one that is ekāgratopetayā, endowed with one-pointedness.
It is this ekāgratopetayā (our Ācārya's own expression), together with sūkṣmayā buddhyā (Kaṭhopaniṣad) and vyavasāyātmikā buddhiḥ (Bhagavad Gītā), that was beautifully illustrated in the metaphor of the bird on the tree and Arjuna's unwavering attention upon the goal indicated by the Ācārya (represented there by Droṇācārya).
Elsewhere, the Śruti employs a remarkably similar metaphor.
Muṇḍaka Upaniṣad 2.2.4
praṇavo dhanuḥ śaro hy ātmā
brahma tal lakṣyam ucyate ।
apramattena veddhavyaṃ
śaravat tanmayo bhavet ॥
Praṇava is the bow. The individual self is the arrow. Brahman is declared to be the target. It must be pierced by one who is apramatta, alert and free from distraction. Like an arrow becoming firmly lodged in the target, one should become completely absorbed in Brahman.
Reflection: The bow must be held firmly. The arrow must be properly prepared. The target must be clearly recognized. The mind must not wander toward everything surrounding the target. Finally, the arrow must be released without hesitation.
Ekāgratā is the steadying of the aim.
Apramāda is freedom from carelessness, distraction, and spiritual negligence.
Tanmaya-bhāva is complete absorption in the truth revealed by the Upaniṣad.
The word apramattena is especially significant. Brahman is not to be recognized by a mind that is casual, scattered, or divided among many competing ends. The seeker must remain vigilant regarding the central purpose of the pursuit.
Arjuna did not deny the existence of the tree, Droṇācārya, or his brothers. At the moment of aiming, however, they did not occupy his buddhi. Similarly, Vedānta does not require us to deny the empirical world. It asks us to recognize what alone is the final lakṣya, and to prevent the mind from being carried away by that which is merely incidental to the pursuit.
This is lakṣya-śuddhi.
At the level of Karma Yoga, lakṣya-śuddhi means that karma is no longer performed merely for bhoga, aiśvarya, puṇya, or social accomplishment. It is consciously directed toward antaḥkaraṇa-śuddhi and preparation for Self-knowledge.
At the next stage, the lakṣya becomes still more precise. The seeker must recognize Brahman as the very Self that is self-revealed in every cognition (pratibodha-viditaṃ matam - Kena Up 2.4) and cultivate the subtle, one-pointed intellect required to recognize this Awareness as the very "I" in whose presence all thoughts, perceptions, emotions, and experiences arise and are known.
Ātmavidyā does not produce Brahman. Brahman is already the seeker's own Self. The apparent movement toward Brahman is therefore not a movement through space, but the removal of ignorance through clear recognition.
Thus, Arjuna's arrow striking the bird serves as a fitting preliminary metaphor for the highest vision of the Upaniṣads.
Epilogue: The crocodile in the Gaṅgā
Let us conclude with an incident from the Mahābhārata that follows immediately after the bird test.
Such is life. The real examination often follows immediately after the lesson, arriving not as a question to be answered, but as a situation demanding spontaneous action.
1.143.12-13
avagāḍham atho
droṇaṃ salile salile-caraḥ
grāho jagrāha
balavāñ jaṅghānte kāla-coditaḥ
sa samartho ’pi
mokṣāya śiṣyān sarvān acodayat
grāhaṃ hatvā tu
mokṣyadhvaṃ mām iti tvarayann iva
Then, when Droṇa had entered deeply into the water, a
powerful water-creature, impelled by time, seized him at the end of the thigh.
Though capable of freeing himself, Droṇa urged all the
disciples, as though in haste: Free me by killing the crocodile.
1.143.14-15
tad-vākya-samakālaṃ tu bībhatsur niśitaiḥ śaraiḥ
avāryaiḥ pañcabhir grāhaṃ magnam ambhasi tāḍayat
itare tv atha
saṃmūḍhās tatra-patra prapedire
taṃ tu dṛṣṭvā
kriyopetaṃ droṇo ’manyata pāṇḍavam
At the very moment of that word, Bhībhatsu struck the
submerged crocodile in the water with five sharp, irresistible arrows.
The others fell into confusion. Seeing that Pāṇḍava
endowed with such prompt action, Droṇa formed his high estimate of him.
1.143.16
viśiṣṭaṃ sarva-śiṣyebhyaḥ prītimāṃś cābhavat tadā
sa pārtha-bāṇair bahudhā khaṇḍaśaḥ parikalpitaḥ
Then Droṇa saw him as distinguished above all the
disciples and became full of affection. The crocodile had been cut into many
pieces by Pārtha’s arrows.
1.143.17
grāhaḥ pañcatvam āpede jaṅghāṃ tyaktvā mahātmanaḥ
sarva-kriyābhyanujñānāt tathā śiṣyān samānayat
The crocodile released the leg of that great one and met
its end. Then, having obtained permission for the subsequent acts, Droṇa
gathered the disciples.
1.143.18-19
duryodhanaṃ citrasenaṃ duḥśāsana-viviṃśatī
arjunaṃ ca samānīya hy aśvatthāmānam eva ca
śiśukaṃ mṛṇmayaṃ kṛtvā droṇo gaṅgā-jale tataḥ
śiṣyāṇāṃ paśyatāṃ caiva kṣipati sma mahābhujaḥ
Calling together Duryodhana, Citrasena, Duḥśāsana, Viviṃśati,
Arjuna and Aśvatthāman, Droṇa then made a clay image of a child.
As the disciples watched, the mighty-armed Ācārya cast it
into the waters of the Gaṅgā.
1.143.20-21
cakṣuṣī vāsasā caiva baddhvā prādāt śarāsanam
śiśukaṃ viddhyata imaṃ vai jala-sthaṃ baddha-cakṣuṣaḥ
tat-kṣaṇenaiva bībhatsur āvāpair daśabhir vaśī
pañcakair anuvivyādha magnaṃ śiśukam ambhasi
Binding the eyes of Arjuna with cloth, he handed over the
bow and said: Strike this little child standing in the water, while the eyes
are bound.
In that very instant, self-mastered Bhībhatsu struck the
submerged child-figure in the water with ten arrows as they flew forth, and
then pierced it with five more.
1.143.22
tāḥ sa dṛṣṭvā kriyāḥ sarvā droṇo ’manyata pāṇḍavam
viśiṣṭaṃ sarva-śiṣyebhyaḥ prītimāṃś cābhavat tadā
tathābravīn mahātmānaṃ bhāradvājo mahāratham
Seeing all those acts, Droṇa regarded the Pāṇḍava as
distinguished above all the disciples and became full of affection.
Then Bhāradvāja addressed that mahātmā mahāratha (i.e. our beloved Arjuna).
1.143.23
gṛhāṇedaṃ mahābāho viśiṣṭam ati-durdharam
astraṃ brahma-śiro nāma sa-prayoga-nivartanam
Take this, O mighty-armed one. It is extraordinary and exceedingly difficult to withstand: the astra called Brahma-śiras, together with the knowledge of its invocation and withdrawal.
----------------
Reflection: At this point, notice Ācārya Droṇa entrusting the irresistible Brahma-śiras to Arjuna. The moment is especially poignant because he chooses Arjuna over even his own son, Aśvatthāma.
There is also a beautiful metaphor here. Just as Arjuna became the worthy recipient of the foremost among astras, the Brahma-śiras, he would later become the worthy recipient of the foremost among śāstras, Brahmavidyā, from the foremost of Ācāryas, Śrī Kṛṣṇa Himself.
The former required unsurpassed mastery over the bow. The latter required unsurpassed preparedness of the mind. In both cases, Arjuna's ekāgratā, alertness, humility, and steadfast discipleship made him the chosen recipient.
-------------------
1.143.24
Ācārya continued:
na ca te mānuṣeṣv etat prayoktavyaṃ kathaṃcana
jagad vinirdahed etad
alpa-tejasi pātitam
This must never be used by you against human beings. If
released upon one of lesser brilliance, it would burn up the world.
1.143.25-26
asāmānyam idaṃ tāta lokeṣv astraṃ nigadyate
tad dhārayethāḥ prayataḥ śṛṇu cedaṃ vaco mama
bādheta mānuṣaḥ śatrur yadi tvāṃ vīra kaścana
tad-vadhāya prayuñjīthās tad astram idam āhave
This astra, dear child, is declared in the worlds to be
extraordinary. Hold it with great care. Listen now to my word.
If some human enemy should overpower you, O hero, then for
his destruction you may employ this astra in battle.
1.143.27
tatheti saṃpratiśrutya bībhatsuḥ sa kṛtāñjaliḥ
jagrāha paramāstraṃ tad āha cainaṃ punar guruḥ
bhavitā tvat-samo nānyaḥ pumān loke dhanur-dharaḥ
Saying, So be it, Bhībhatsu, with joined palms, gave his
assent and received that supreme astra.
Then the Guru spoke to him again: In this world there will
be no other wielder of the bow equal to you.
Reflection: The bird test reveals purity of attention.
The crocodile test reveals ever-readiness and obedience
In the first test, Arjuna’s mind gathered into one point. In
the second test, action arose without delay. This is why Droṇa saw him as viśiṣṭaṃ sarva-śiṣyebhyaḥ,
distinguished among all the disciples.
Yudhiṣṭhira represents the dhārmika fullness of vision.
Arjuna represents the tapas of attention. Both have greatness.
For
karma-yoga-buddhi, the mind must move from general nobility to clarity w.r.t the
ultimate goal of life.
It must learn to see what must be seen, do what must be
done, and offer that action to Īśvara.
That is why this episode is useful for our Gītā-manana. The
subtle shift is from good, sincere, dhārmika karmatā to karma-yoga-buddhi. That
shift requires vyavasāyātmikā buddhi.
Sources and References: Mahābhāratam (Kumbhakonam Edition / Southern Recension), Ādi-parva 1.142.78-87, 1.143.1-27, and the immediately succeeding episode (1.143.28 ff.); Bheeshma Parva (Critical Edition/CE); Bhagavad Gītā 2.41, 2.42, 2.44, 2.45, 7.25, and 16.5; Kaṭhopaniṣad 1.3.12 with Śrī Ādi Śaṅkarācārya's Bhāṣyam; Muṇḍaka Upaniṣad 2.2.4; Kena Up (2.4); Images from Amar Chitra Katha - Volume -1 of 3 - titled Kuru Princes, chapter - 5 Enter Drona)



.jpeg)
.jpeg)
Comments
Post a Comment