A conversational reflection on a very real doubt in Advaita Vedānta

When Matter Looks Polluted but Brahman Stays Pure

A conversational reflection on a very real doubt in Advaita Vedānta

Recently my friend sent me a beautiful, honest question over WhatsApp:

“If the entire universe is just nāma–rūpa (name and form) of Brahman, then matter is also Brahman. Everything is Brahman.
Then why does it still appear dual when we say, ‘Existence is not a part or property of matter and is not affected by whatever happens to the material world’?

It sounds as if matter and Brahman are separate when we say, ‘Brahman pervades matter but is untouched by it,’ while at the same time we also say matter is only name and form of Brahman alone.

And further – if matter is not a second thing, how is it that we seem to pollute matter while Brahman remains untainted?”

If you’ve spent time with Upaniṣads, Gītā, Taittirīya, Drg-Drśya Viveka, different teachers and commentaries… this kind of “back and forth confusion” is totally natural. Let’s unpack the doubt in simple, blog-level language.

1. “Brahman pervades everything” – a helpful but temporary metaphor

Advaita often uses the language of pervasion:

“Brahman pervades the world.”
“Consciousness pervades all matter.”

This sounds like there are two things:

one called “Brahman” that spreads through
another called “matter” or “universe”.

But in Advaita, this is only a teaching device, not a final description of reality.

Traditional teachers call this adhyāropa – deliberate superimposition:

We speak as if world and Brahman are two,
just to help the mind shift attention from changing forms to the changeless basis.

Once that shift happens, the next step is apavāda – negation:

We take back what we said in a provisional way.
We see: there is no second substance called “matter” apart from Brahman.
There is only one reality, which appears as if many.

So “pervasion” is like scaffolding. You use it to build the understanding, and then you remove it.

2. What is really there in every experience?

A lovely summary from Drg-Drśya Viveka helps here:

asti bhāti priyaṃ rūpaṃ nāma cety aṃśapañcakam |
ādyatrayaṃ brahmarūpaṃ jagadrūpaṃ tato dvayam ||

Every experience has five aspects:

asti – “it is” (existence)
bhāti – “it shines” (is known, awareness)
priyam – “it is liked / has a sense of value or fulfillment”
rūpa – form
nāma – name

The first three (asti–bhāti–priyam) belong to Brahman.
The last two (nāma–rūpa) make up the world.

Another verse from the same text says:

khavāyv agni-jalorvīṣu deva-tiryaṅ-narādiṣu |
abhinnāḥ saccidānandā bhidyete rūpa-nāmanī ||

In space, air, fire, water, earth; in gods, animals, humans—
sat–cit–ānanda (existence–consciousness–bliss) is one and undivided.
Only the names and forms differ.

So:

“Matter” = a shifting combination of name and form.
The is-ness, the know-ability, the basic sense of value/meaning behind it all = Brahman.

We usually focus on shape, color, utility, good, bad, etc.
Vedānta nudges us to notice:

“Behind every changing description, there is something simply ‘is’ and ‘is known’ — that is the real.”

3. So where does “pollution” come in?

My friend's follow-up doubt was sharp:

“If the wave is just water, we say it’s only a temporary form.
But with matter, it really looks as if we are polluting it.
If all is Brahman, how does pollution make sense, and yet Brahman remain untouched?”

A few key points:

a) “Good” and “bad” are painted by the mind

When we say “this is polluted,” “that is pure,”
the mind is supplying those labels.

“Pollution” is not an independent stuff that exists apart from awareness.
It is an attribution based on:
- standpoint (human, animal, ecological),
- conditioning (culture, values),
- and utility (what helps or harms life).

This doesn’t mean pollution is “imaginary” in the sense of trivial; it means:

It is real in the transactional sense (vyavahāra),
but it doesn’t touch the absolute nature (pāramārthika) of reality as Brahman.

b) What are we actually rearranging?

When we say, “We polluted the river”:

At the material level:
- chemical composition changes,
- water becomes unsafe,
- living beings suffer.
  That demands dharma: responsibility, correction, care.
At the ultimate level:
- nothing has added a new “defect” to Brahman.
- Only names, forms, and their relations have been rearranged in the light of awareness.

Brahman, as pure consciousness and existence, is never affected—
just as the movie screen is not burnt when the film shows a fire scene.

So:

For living a responsible life: “We are polluting the river; we must stop, clean, and restore.”
For Vedāntic clarity: “Even this entire drama of pollution and purification appears in one untainted Awareness, my own Self.”

Both levels are valid in their own place.

4. Why teaching must first accept duality

Advaita’s central teaching method is called:

adhyāropa–apavāda–nyāya
“Deliberate superimposition followed by systematic negation.”

Why is this necessary?

We already live under a natural, beginningless adhyāsa
– superimposition of:
- “I am this body-mind,
- I am the doer,
- I am the enjoyer,
- this world is absolutely real,
- I am separate from God and others,” etc.
If scripture simply said:

“Brahman is attributeless, actionless, birthless.”
and stopped there,
the mind wouldn’t know what to do with it. It would remain a dry concept.
So the Upaniṣads intentionally meet us where we are:
- “Brahman is the creator.”
- “Īśvara sustains the world.”
- “Brahman pervades matter.”
- “Do good, avoid bad, refine the mind.”
This is teaching-level duality, a second adhyāropa, but this time a guided, corrective one.
Once the mind is refined and capable of subtle inquiry,
the same śāstra performs apavāda:
- “That creator is not other than your own Self.”
- “The world is not a second reality but nāma–rūpa on Brahman.”
- “jīva, jagat, Īśvara are not three independent entities, but one nondual reality seen in three ways.”

This is where statements like “ekam eva advitīyam” (“One alone, without a second”) are meant to land as living recognition, not just as poetry.

5. When understanding stabilizes

Drg-Drśya Viveka again gives a glimpse of what this mature understanding looks like:

dehābhimāne galite vijñāte paramātmani |
yatra yatra mano yāti tatra tatra samādhayaḥ || 30 ||

When identification with the body has fallen away,
and the Supreme Self is recognized,
wherever the mind may go,
there itself is samādhi.

In other words:

Once you see clearly that your very “I am” (iruppu / being) and “I know” (unarvu / awareness) are one with Brahman,
everything else—names, forms, religions, philosophies, even the play of duality—
simply appear in that awareness, as that awareness.

Confusion may still come and go at the level of thought,
especially when we hear teachings from different standpoints (karma, bhakti, upāsanā, jñāna, etc.).
But over time, a quiet conviction settles:

“Whatever appears, appears to me, in me, as me, the one Awareness that is never polluted, never broken, never diminished.”

6. A practical closing note

In our WhatsApp exchange, my friend wrote:

“My understanding appears and disappears when the explanation comes from a different angle. Then it feels dual again.”

That is completely okay. In fact, that oscillation is exactly where mananam (systematic reflection) does its work.

A gentle way forward could be:

Keep revisiting a few central prakaraṇa texts and verses
(like Drg-Drśya Viveka, Gītā 2.16, Taittirīya’s Ānandavallī).
Each time confusion arises, ask:
- “From which level is this being spoken—transactional or absolute?”
- “Is this adhyāropa (for teaching) or apavāda (final vision)?”
Talk it out with a trusted friend, mentor, or guru.
As we joked in the chat:

It becomes good mananam for both sides. 😊

In summary:

Matter is not a second thing apart from Brahman.
Pollution and purity belong to the realm of nāma & rūpa and human responsibility,
not to Brahman’s intrinsic nature.
Pervasion, creation, etc. are intentional teaching metaphors,
later taken back through adhyāropa-apavāda to leave you with the simple, direct fact:

The Self that is aware of all this, right now, is the very Brahman the Upaniṣads are talking about, ever pure, ever full, ever free.

Search This Blog

Mananam